There seems to be a world of difference between the environmental impacts of wild land and the impacts of urban green spaces, as well as the way they affect biodiversity and biodiversity conservation. It is not always the case that the difference in impact is one-to-one. It is a complex issue, and as humans we tend to focus on the negatives, while wildlife, plants, and animals, focus on the positives.
Conservation is one of my favorite subjects to talk about, so when I hear people talk about the negatives of conservation, my brain immediately goes there. But when I hear people talk about the positives, I immediately think of the positives as the way to go. In other words, the environmental impacts of conserving nature should be the same no matter where you live, and the impacts of conserving biodiversity should be the same no matter where you are.
This is a good point, but it is a bit ironic that we can get so caught up in the negative of conservation when it is so much more important than the positive. There are many things that conservation can do for the environment that are not environmentally friendly like polluting the drinking water, destroying the habitats of endangered species, and causing a large amount of human-caused pollution.
I’ve been to the Bay of Plenty in California and have gotten so taken by the idea of how to get rid of wildlife in the Bay of Plenty that I’m not sure I can say I’ve ever seen it before. It seems like the Bay of Plenty has been a pretty quiet place for more than a decade. The beach is not empty at all, but the water is still pretty dry. Every single piece of water now has its own little scent of salt.
As I get older, I realize that this is all really just a huge waste of resources. Instead of cleaning up the Great Barrier Reef, for example, we should be trying to develop more and more rainforests. This is where the great biodiversity is. We could have a lot more biodiversity, and that would mean less pollution, less pollution that makes animals sick and weaker. It would mean less damage to the environment overall.
This is where the great biodiversity is, and it’s where the great pollution is, as well. It’s a bit depressing that this is where the great biodiversity is, but it’s also just a waste of resources to try to clean up the Great Barrier Reef. It’s an all-in-one coral reef, and it’s only about a quarter of the size of the Grand Canyon.
I’d like to see more diversity in the Gobi Desert. There are lots of plants that come from this area, so I can’t wait to see them grow and help you grow them.
Global biodiversity is the sum of genetic diversity across the globe, but it also refers to diversity and abundance that is measured from the top down. The Great Barrier Reef is a great example of this, as it’s a single reef that is over a mile below sea level. This means that almost all of the reef is dead, and there is little genetic diversity or abundance. The Great Barrier Reef’s genetics are just as important as its biodiversity.
Its easy to forget that the Great Barrier Reef is only about 1.5 times as large as the Great Lakes and even that is only about 1/100th as big as the Pacific Ocean. That means that just a couple of its species are 100% unique to the Great Barrier Reef. If you had to name a few of the most important biodiversity conservation species, the Great Barrier Reef is an obvious choice. The first is the Red Sea herring, named by the French for its red color.
One of the most important things about the Great Barrier Reef is its abundance of species. A lot of the species that are found on it live on the surface of the Great Barrier Reef, but only around 5% of them are free-ranging. They only need a few hundred thousand pounds of food to survive, so by the time you get there, you need about 70,000 pounds of food to survive, but that’s only about 2% of the food you need to live on.